Case-IH 9370 or New Holland 9682 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the New Holland 9682 is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Case-IH 9370 is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 9370 and New Holland 9682 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
Question93709682Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?239.9 kW (321.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”238.4 kW (319.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9370 and the 9682.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9370 and the 9682.
Which pumps more oil for implements?103.0 L/min (27.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”178.8 L/min (47.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”AheadThe New Holland 9682 has 74% more hydraulic flow (75.8 L/min / 20.0 gpm) than the Case-IH 9370 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?11,819 kg (26,056 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”9,170 kg (20,216 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”AheadThe Case-IH 9370 has 29% more lift (2,649 kg / 5,840 lb) than the New Holland 9682 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?15,325 kg (33,786 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”14,528 kg (32,029 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?17,236 kg (37,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9370.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”12Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9370 and the 9682.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9370 and the 9682.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9370”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–20001995–1999EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 9682 has 74% more hydraulic flow (75.8 L/min / 20.0 gpm) than the Case-IH 9370 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 9370 has 29% more lift (2,649 kg / 5,840 lb) than the New Holland 9682 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources