Case-IH 9350 vs New Holland TJ-325

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1995–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2001–2005

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 9350 and the TJ-325 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH 9350 and New Holland TJ-325, field by field
Field	9350	TJ-325	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	306 hp	321 hp	—
Engine declared	CUMMINS MTA-11 A	CUMMINS 6 TAA-9304	differs
Displacement declared	10.82 L	8.85 L	+22% 9350
Maximum torque declared	1,016 lb·ft · 1,378 N·m	1,062 lb·ft · 1,440 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	—	Pedal-operated electrohydraulic wet multi-disc clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	27.2 gpm · 103.0 L/min	40.9 gpm · 154.8 L/min	+50% TJ-325
Pressure declared	2,495 psi · 172 bar	2,596–2,698 psi · 179–186 bar	differs
Three-point lift at ends declared	15,849 lb · 7,189 kg	15,673 lb · 7,109 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	28,722 lb · 13,028 kg	31,934 lb · 14,485 kg	+11% TJ-325
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	39,022 lb · 17,700 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	132.5 in · 3,366 mm	139.0 in · 3,531 mm	—
Length declared	296.7 in · 7,535 mm	276.0 in · 7,010 mm	+7% 9350
Width declared	136.9 in · 3,477 mm	120.0 in · 3,048 mm	+14% 9350
Height declared	135.2 in · 3,434 mm	137.0 in · 3,480 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	11.7 in · 297 mm	13.0 in · 330 mm	+11% TJ-325
Turning radius, braked declared	12.8 ft · 3.90 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	799.9 qt · 757.0 L	799.9 qt · 757.0 L	—

Source

Source