Case-IH 9350 or Case-IH STX 325?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH STX 325: hydraulic flow and three-point lift.

  • The Case-IH STX 325 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 50% (51.8 L/min / 13.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 22% (1,581 kg / 3,486 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 9350 and Case-IH STX 325, with the call on each
Question9350STX 325Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?206.6 kW (277.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”217.6 kW (291.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9350 and the STX 325.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9350 and the STX 325.
Which pumps more oil for implements?103.0 L/min (27.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”154.8 L/min (40.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”AheadThe Case-IH STX 325 has 50% more hydraulic flow (51.8 L/min / 13.7 gpm) than the Case-IH 9350 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,189 kg (15,849 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”8,770 kg (19,335 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”AheadThe Case-IH STX 325 has 22% more lift (1,581 kg / 3,486 lb) than the Case-IH 9350 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?13,028 kg (28,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”14,485 kg (31,934 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH STX 325 is 11% heavier (1,457 kg / 3,212 lb) than the Case-IH 9350 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?17,700 kg (39,022 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9350.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”17Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9350 and the STX 325.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9350 and the STX 325.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9350”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–20002000–2005Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH STX 325 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH STX 325 has 50% more hydraulic flow (51.8 L/min / 13.7 gpm) than the Case-IH 9350 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH STX 325 has 22% more lift (1,581 kg / 3,486 lb) than the Case-IH 9350 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH STX 325 is 11% heavier (1,457 kg / 3,212 lb) than the Case-IH 9350 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH STX 325 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources