Case-IH 9330 vs New Holland TJ-275

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1995–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2001–2005

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 9330 and the TJ-275 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH 9330 and New Holland TJ-275, field by field
Field	9330	TJ-275	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	236.7 hp	271.3 hp	+15% TJ-275
Engine declared	CUMMINS 6 TA-830 A	CUMMINS 6 TAA-8304	differs
Displacement declared	8.27 L	8.27 L	—
Maximum torque declared	754 lb·ft · 1,022 N·m	954 lb·ft · 1,293 N·m	+27% TJ-275
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Oil-immersed U.V.C. multi-plate clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	28.7 gpm · 108.6 L/min	40.9 gpm · 154.8 L/min	+43% TJ-275
Pressure declared	2,495 psi · 172 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	15,984 lb · 7,250 kg	15,673 lb · 7,109 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	23,649 lb · 10,727 kg	31,795 lb · 14,422 kg	+34% TJ-275
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	33,069 lb · 15,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	120.4 in · 3,058 mm	139.0 in · 3,531 mm	+15% TJ-275
Length declared	252.4 in · 6,410 mm	276.0 in · 7,010 mm	+9% TJ-275
Width declared	113.8 in · 2,890 mm	120.0 in · 3,048 mm	+5% TJ-275
Height declared	128.7 in · 3,269 mm	137.0 in · 3,480 mm	+6% TJ-275
Ground clearance declared	11.0 in · 280 mm	13.0 in · 330 mm	+18% TJ-275
Turning radius, braked declared	12.8 ft · 3.90 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	459.7 qt · 435.0 L	799.9 qt · 757.0 L	+74% TJ-275

Source

Source