Case-IH 9250 or New Holland 9482 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland 9482: hydraulic flow.
- The New Holland 9482 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 60% (63.6 L/min / 16.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9250 | 9482 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 198.4 kW (266.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | 204.1 kW (273.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9250 and the 9482. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9250 and the 9482. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 105.2 L/min (27.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | 168.8 L/min (44.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | AheadThe New Holland 9482 has 60% more hydraulic flow (63.6 L/min / 16.8 gpm) than the Case-IH 9250 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,384 kg (14,074 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 9482. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 13,635 kg (30,060 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | 13,683 kg (30,166 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 15,422 kg (34,000 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9250. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9250 and the 9482. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9250 and the 9482. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9482” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1995 | 1995–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 9482 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland 9482 has 60% more hydraulic flow (63.6 L/min / 16.8 gpm) than the Case-IH 9250 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 9482 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources