Case-IH 9230 or New Holland 9184?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland 9184: power at the PTO shaft and hydraulic flow.

  • The New Holland 9184 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: 10% (15.8 kW / 21.2 hp) more power at the PTO shaft.
  • The New Holland 9184 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (55.9 L/min / 14.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 9230 and New Holland 9184, with the call on each
Question92309184Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?155.0 kW (207.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”170.8 kW (229.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”AheadThe New Holland 9184 has 10% more power at the PTO (15.8 kW / 21.2 hp) than the Case-IH 9230 (both power at the PTO, claimed).
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9230 and the 9184.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9230 and the 9184.
Which pumps more oil for implements?109.8 L/min (29.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”165.7 L/min (43.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”AheadThe New Holland 9184 has 51% more hydraulic flow (55.9 L/min / 14.8 gpm) than the Case-IH 9230 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,384 kg (14,074 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 9184.
Which is heavier, for traction?10,935 kg (24,108 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”11,327 kg (24,972 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?13,254 kg (29,220 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9230.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”12Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9230 and the 9184.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9230 and the 9184.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9184”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19952000–2001Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 9184 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 9184 has 10% more power at the PTO (15.8 kW / 21.2 hp) than the Case-IH 9230 (both power at the PTO, claimed).
  • The New Holland 9184 has 51% more hydraulic flow (55.9 L/min / 14.8 gpm) than the Case-IH 9230 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 9184 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources