Case-IH 9230 or John Deere 8560?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9230 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 8560 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9230 | 8560 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 172.8 kW (231.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 173 kW (232 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9230 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9230 and the 8560. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9230 and the 8560. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 109.8 L/min (29.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 165.0 L/min (43.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | AheadThe John Deere 8560 has 50% more hydraulic flow (55.2 L/min / 14.6 gpm) than the Case-IH 9230 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,384 kg (14,074 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 5,300 kg (11,684 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | AheadThe Case-IH 9230 has 20% more lift (1,084 kg / 2,390 lb) than the John Deere 8560 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 10,935 kg (24,108 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 14,549 kg (32,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8560 is 33% heavier (3,614 kg / 7,968 lb) than the Case-IH 9230 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9230 and the 8560. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9230 and the 8560. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | AheadThe John Deere 8560 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Case-IH 9230 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9230 and the 8560. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9230” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8560” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1995 | 1989–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 8560 has 50% more hydraulic flow (55.2 L/min / 14.6 gpm) than the Case-IH 9230 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 9230 has 20% more lift (1,084 kg / 2,390 lb) than the John Deere 8560 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8560 is 33% heavier (3,614 kg / 7,968 lb) than the Case-IH 9230 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8560 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Case-IH 9230 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9230 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8560 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources