Case-IH 9180 or New Holland 9882 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the New Holland 9882 is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Case-IH 9180 is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 9180 and New Holland 9882 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
Question91809882Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?257.0 kW (344.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”275.8 kW (369.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9180 and the 9882.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9180 and the 9882.
Which pumps more oil for implements?117.3 L/min (31.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”184.1 L/min (48.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”AheadThe New Holland 9882 has 57% more hydraulic flow (66.8 L/min / 17.6 gpm) than the Case-IH 9180 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?11,339 kg (24,998 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”9,170 kg (20,216 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”AheadThe Case-IH 9180 has 24% more lift (2,169 kg / 4,782 lb) than the New Holland 9882 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?16,140 kg (35,583 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”14,440 kg (31,835 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 9180 is 12% heavier (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) than the New Holland 9882 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?19,958 kg (44,000 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9180.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”12Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9180 and the 9882.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9180 and the 9882.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9180”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9882”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–19901995–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 9882 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 9882 has 57% more hydraulic flow (66.8 L/min / 17.6 gpm) than the Case-IH 9180 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 9180 has 24% more lift (2,169 kg / 4,782 lb) than the New Holland 9882 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 9180 is 12% heavier (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) than the New Holland 9882 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 9882 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources