Case-IH 9170 or Ford 946?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 946 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH 9170 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH 9170 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9170 | 946 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 246.4 kW (330.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | 242.3 kW (324.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 946 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9170 and the 946. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9170 and the 946. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 117.3 L/min (31.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | 95.4 L/min (25.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | AheadThe Case-IH 9170 has 23% more hydraulic flow (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Ford 946 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 11,676 kg (25,741 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 946. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 15,405 kg (33,962 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | 14,760 kg (32,540 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 16,350 kg (36,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9170. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9170 and the 946. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | AheadThe Case-IH 9170 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 946 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9170 and the 946. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9170” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 946” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1987–1990 | 1989–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH 9170 has 23% more hydraulic flow (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Ford 946 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 9170 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 946 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9170 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 946 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources