Case-IH 845 XL (A) or URSUS 932/934?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 845 XL (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 932/934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The URSUS 932/934 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (12.6 L/min / 3.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 30% (957 kg / 2,110 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The URSUS 932/934 suits road haulage better on this data: 28% (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 845 XL (A) and URSUS 932/934, with the call on each
Question845 XL (A)932/934Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?58.8 kW (78.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”58.8 kW (78.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 845 XL (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 932/934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 845 XL (A) and the 932/934.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 845 XL (A) and the 932/934.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.6 L/min (8.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”45.2 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”AheadThe URSUS 932/934 has 39% more hydraulic flow (12.6 L/min / 3.3 gpm) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,150 kg (6,945 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”4,107 kg (9,054 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”AheadThe URSUS 932/934 has 30% more lift (957 kg / 2,110 lb) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,660 kg (8,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”4,240 kg (9,348 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 932/934 is 16% heavier (580 kg / 1,279 lb) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”7,400 kg (16,314 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”AheadThe URSUS 932/934 has 28% higher maximum permissible mass (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”16Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 845 XL (A) and the 932/934.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 932/934.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 932/934”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19961990–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The URSUS 932/934 has 39% more hydraulic flow (12.6 L/min / 3.3 gpm) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 932/934 has 30% more lift (957 kg / 2,110 lb) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 932/934 is 16% heavier (580 kg / 1,279 lb) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 932/934 has 28% higher maximum permissible mass (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 845 XL (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 932/934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources