Case-IH 7250 Magnum or Renault Atles 935 RZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7250 Magnum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 935 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Atles 935 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 31% (2,889 kg / 6,369 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 7250 Magnum and Renault Atles 935 RZ, with the call on each
Question7250 MagnumAtles 935 RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?183.1 kW (245.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”184 kW (247 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7250 Magnum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 935 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7250 Magnum and the Atles 935 RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7250 Magnum and the Atles 935 RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?109.4 L/min (28.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Atles 935 RZ.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,361 kg (20,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”12,250 kg (27,007 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”AheadThe Renault Atles 935 RZ has 31% more lift (2,889 kg / 6,369 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 Magnum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?8,228 kg (18,140 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”9,520 kg (20,988 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Atles 935 RZ is 16% heavier (1,292 kg / 2,848 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 Magnum (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”12,350 kg (27,227 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Atles 935 RZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”AheadThe Renault Atles 935 RZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH 7250 Magnum does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 7250 Magnum.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 935 RZ”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19972000–2002Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Atles 935 RZ is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Atles 935 RZ has 31% more lift (2,889 kg / 6,369 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 Magnum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Atles 935 RZ is 16% heavier (1,292 kg / 2,848 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 Magnum (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Atles 935 RZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH 7250 Magnum does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault Atles 935 RZ is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7250 Magnum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 935 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources