Case-IH 7150 Magnum or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7150 Magnum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 45% (3,260 kg / 7,187 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7150 Magnum | Agrotron 265 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 182 kW (244 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 184 kW (247 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7150 Magnum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7150 Magnum and the Agrotron 265. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7150 Magnum and the Agrotron 265. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 93.8 L/min (24.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 120.0 L/min (31.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 28% more hydraulic flow (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,240 kg (15,961 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 45% more lift (3,260 kg / 7,187 lb) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,431 kg (18,587 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 9,050 kg (19,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7150 Magnum and the Agrotron 265. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7150” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1993 | 2003–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 28% more hydraulic flow (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 45% more lift (3,260 kg / 7,187 lb) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Case-IH 7150 Magnum (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 265 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7150 Magnum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources