Case-IH 5240 (DT) or Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16: three-point lift. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 750 rpm.
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (652 kg / 1,437 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 5240 (DT) and Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16, with the call on each
Question5240 (DT)AgroPrima 6.16Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?75.6 kW (101.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240”76 kW (102 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT) and the AgroPrima 6.16.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT) and the AgroPrima 6.16.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT) and the AgroPrima 6.16.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,548 kg (10,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240”5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16 has 14% more lift (652 kg / 1,437 lb) than the Case-IH 5240 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,590 kg (10,119 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240”4,450 kg (9,811 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240”15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5240 (DT) and the AgroPrima 6.16.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240”540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH 5240 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 5240 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19971992–1995EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16 has 14% more lift (652 kg / 1,437 lb) than the Case-IH 5240 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 6.16 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH 5240 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources