Case-IH 5150 Maxxum or Case-IH CS 130?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5150 Maxxum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CS 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Case-IH CS 130 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (48.8 L/min / 12.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 92% (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Case-IH CS 130 suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 5150 Maxxum and Case-IH CS 130, with the call on each
Question5150 MaxxumCS 130Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?91.9 kW (123.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”91.9 kW (123.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5150 Maxxum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CS 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5150 Maxxum and the CS 130.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5150 Maxxum and the CS 130.
Which pumps more oil for implements?75.0 L/min (19.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”123.8 L/min (32.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”AheadThe Case-IH CS 130 has 65% more hydraulic flow (48.8 L/min / 12.9 gpm) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”8,830 kg (19,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”AheadThe Case-IH CS 130 has 92% more lift (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”6,205 kg (13,680 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CS 130 is 16% heavier (845 kg / 1,863 lb) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,800 kg (17,196 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”AheadThe Case-IH CS 130 has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”24 to 40Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5150 Maxxum and the CS 130.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5150”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS130”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1992–19971997–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CS 130 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH CS 130 has 65% more hydraulic flow (48.8 L/min / 12.9 gpm) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH CS 130 has 92% more lift (4,230 kg / 9,326 lb) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH CS 130 is 16% heavier (845 kg / 1,863 lb) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH CS 130 has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) than the Case-IH 5150 Maxxum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH CS 130 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5150 Maxxum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CS 130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources