BUKH DZ-30 vs Kramer KB 22 C

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

BUKH DZ-30

1956–1958

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Kramer KB 22 C

1951–1954

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the DZ-30 and the KB 22 C → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

BUKH DZ-30 and Kramer KB 22 C, field by field
FieldDZ-30KB 22 CGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed29.6 hp21 hp+38% DZ-30
Engine declaredBUKH 2 EV-100Güldner 2 DAdiffers
Displacement declared2.04 L1.63 L+25% DZ-30
Maximum torque declared66 lb·ft · 89 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared12.4 mph · 20 km/h12.4 mph · 20 km/h
Clutch declaredSingle-plate dry clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared3.6 gpm · 13.5 L/min4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min+19% KB 22 C
Pressure declared1,991 psi · 137 bar1,707 psi · 118 bar+16% DZ-30
Three-point lift at ends declared1,477 lb · 670 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm528 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,571 lb · 1,620 kg2,579 lb · 1,170 kg+38% DZ-30
Wheelbase declared71.7 in · 1,820 mm68.1 in · 1,730 mm
Length declared110.4 in · 2,805 mm113.0 in · 2,870 mm
Width declared64.6 in · 1,640 mm60.6–61.0 in · 1,540–1,550 mmdiffers
Height declared65.9 in · 1,675 mm62.2 in · 1,580 mm+6% DZ-30
Ground clearance declared17.7 in · 450 mm14.6 in · 370 mm+22% DZ-30
Turning radius, braked declared10.2 ft · 3.10 m
Fuel tank declared38.0 qt · 36.0 L21.1 qt · 20 L+80% DZ-30

BUKH DZ-30 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh DZ-30”

Kramer KB 22 C sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 22 C”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 20”