BUKH 554 (Super) or IMT 555?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 554 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The BUKH 554 (Super) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 112% (16.9 L/min / 4.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 53% (620 kg / 1,367 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BUKH 554 (Super) and IMT 555, with the call on each
Question554 (Super)555Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?37.5 kW (50.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 554 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 554 (Super) and the 555.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 554 (Super) and the 555.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”15.1 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”AheadThe BUKH 554 (Super) has 112% more hydraulic flow (16.9 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the IMT 555 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”1,180 kg (2,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”AheadThe BUKH 554 (Super) has 53% more lift (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the IMT 555 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,490 kg (5,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”1,870 kg (4,123 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BUKH 554 (Super) is 33% heavier (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the IMT 555 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 554 (Super) and the 555.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”6Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”AheadThe BUKH 554 (Super) has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 555 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 555.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”AheadThe BUKH 554 (Super) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 555 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 555.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1963–19671964–1971EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The BUKH 554 (Super) has 112% more hydraulic flow (16.9 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the IMT 555 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 554 (Super) has 53% more lift (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the IMT 555 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 554 (Super) is 33% heavier (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the IMT 555 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 554 (Super) has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 555 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 554 (Super) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 555 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 554 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources