BUKH 554 (Super) or Dexheimer Allrad 345 N?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 554 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345N suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BUKH 554 (Super) and Dexheimer Allrad 345 N, with the call on each
Question554 (Super)Allrad 345 NCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?37.5 kW (50.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”37 kW (50 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 554 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 554 (Super) and the Allrad 345 N.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 554 (Super) and the Allrad 345 N.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”41 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”AheadThe Dexheimer Allrad 345N has 28% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the BUKH 554 (Super) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 554 (Super): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”); the Allrad 345 N: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,490 kg (5,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”1,625 kg (3,583 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BUKH 554 (Super) is 53% heavier (865 kg / 1,907 lb) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 554 (Super) and the Allrad 345 N.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”8Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Allrad 345 N.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”—No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Allrad 345 N.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Allrad 345 N.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”AheadThe Dexheimer Allrad 345N is available with four-wheel drive; the BUKH 554 (Super) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1963–19671976–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Dexheimer Allrad 345N is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345N has 28% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the BUKH 554 (Super) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 554 (Super) is 53% heavier (865 kg / 1,907 lb) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345N is available with four-wheel drive; the BUKH 554 (Super) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345N is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 554 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 554 (Super): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 554”); the Allrad 345 N: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources