BUKH 452 (Super) or Renault 456?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 452 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 456 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 456 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (300 kg / 661 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BUKH 452 (Super) and Renault 456, with the call on each
Question452 (Super)456Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 452 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 456 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 452 (Super) and the 456.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 452 (Super) and the 456.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 456.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”AheadThe Renault 456 has 18% more lift (300 kg / 661 lb) than the BUKH 452 (Super) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BUKH 452 (Super) is 18% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Renault 456 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 452 (Super) and the 456.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 456.
Which is faster on the road?23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”AheadThe BUKH 452 (Super) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 456 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 456 R7255”AheadThe Renault 456 is available with four-wheel drive; the BUKH 452 (Super) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1960–19671968–1972Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 456 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 456 has 18% more lift (300 kg / 661 lb) than the BUKH 452 (Super) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 452 (Super) is 18% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Renault 456 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 452 (Super) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 456 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 456 is available with four-wheel drive; the BUKH 452 (Super) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 456 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 452 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 456 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources