BUKH 452 (Super) or MASSEY-HARRIS 744?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 452 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 744 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The BUKH 452 (Super) suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BUKH 452 (Super) and MASSEY-HARRIS 744, with the call on each
Question452 (Super)744Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 744”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 452 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 744 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 452 (Super) and the 744.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 452 (Super) and the 744.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 744.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 744.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”2,320 kg (5,115 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 744”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 452 (Super) and the 744.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”5Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 744”AheadThe BUKH 452 (Super) has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the MASSEY-HARRIS 744 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 744.
Which is faster on the road?23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 744”AheadThe BUKH 452 (Super) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the MASSEY-HARRIS 744 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”534 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 744”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 744.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 744.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 452”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 744”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1960–19671948–1953Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BUKH 452 (Super) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The BUKH 452 (Super) has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the MASSEY-HARRIS 744 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 452 (Super) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the MASSEY-HARRIS 744 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The BUKH 452 (Super) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 452 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 744 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources