Bührer PF-21 Super (A) or Deutz (KHD) D 6806?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Deutz D 6806: hydraulic flow.

  • The Deutz D 6806 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 45% (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Bührer PF-21 Super (A) and Deutz (KHD) D 6806, with the call on each
QuestionPF-21 Super (A)D 6806Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the PF-21 Super (A) and the D 6806.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the PF-21 Super (A) and the D 6806.
Which pumps more oil for implements?19.5 L/min (5.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”28.3 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”AheadThe Deutz D 6806 has 45% more hydraulic flow (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Bührer PF-21 Super (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 6806.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,430 kg (5,357 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”2,760 kg (6,085 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 6806 is 14% heavier (330 kg / 728 lb) than the Bührer PF-21 Super (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the PF-21 Super (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?15Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the PF-21 Super (A) and the D 6806.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/770 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 6806.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer PF 21 Super(A)”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1968–19741974–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 6806 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz D 6806 has 45% more hydraulic flow (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Bührer PF-21 Super (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 6806 is 14% heavier (330 kg / 728 lb) than the Bührer PF-21 Super (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 6806 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources