Bührer Komfort 465 (A) or Renault 75-32 MX?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 75-32 MX: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on top speed and PTO speeds. On features, the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) is ahead on drive.
- The Renault 75-32 MX suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Renault 75-32 MX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 97% (21.4 L/min / 5.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 105% (2,345 kg / 5,170 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault 75-32 MX suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Komfort 465 (A) | 75-32 MX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 44.3 kW (59.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Komfort 465 (A) and the 75-32 MX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Komfort 465 (A) and the 75-32 MX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 43.4 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | AheadThe Renault 75-32 MX has 97% more hydraulic flow (21.4 L/min / 5.7 gpm) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,225 kg (4,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 4,570 kg (10,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | AheadThe Renault 75-32 MX has 105% more lift (2,345 kg / 5,170 lb) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,590 kg (5,710 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 75-32 MX is 24% heavier (610 kg / 1,345 lb) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,620 kg (12,390 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Komfort 465 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 15Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Komfort 465 (A) and the 75-32 MX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | AheadThe Renault 75-32 MX has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | AheadThe Renault 75-32 MX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 75-32 MX. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer 465/465A” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3141” | AheadThe Bührer Komfort 465 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 75-32 MX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1975–1978 | 1989–1993 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 75-32 MX is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 75-32 MX has 97% more hydraulic flow (21.4 L/min / 5.7 gpm) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 75-32 MX has 105% more lift (2,345 kg / 5,170 lb) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 75-32 MX is 24% heavier (610 kg / 1,345 lb) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 75-32 MX has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 75-32 MX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Bührer Komfort 465 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Bührer Komfort 465 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 75-32 MX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 75-32 MX is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources