Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) or J.I. Case 930?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 930: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds. On features, the Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) is ahead on forward gears and drive.

  • The J.I. Case 930 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The J.I. Case 930 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (19.7 L/min / 5.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) and J.I. Case 930, with the call on each
QuestionKomfort 6105 (A)930Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?63.0 kW (84.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”61.8 kW (82.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 930”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Komfort 6105 (A) and the 930.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Komfort 6105 (A) and the 930.
Which pumps more oil for implements?39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”58.7 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 930”AheadThe J.I. Case 930 has 51% more hydraulic flow (19.7 L/min / 5.2 gpm) than the Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 930.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,730 kg (8,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”3,970 kg (8,752 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 930”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 930.
Which has the wider choice of gears?15Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Case 930”AheadThe Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) has 88% more forward gears (7 gears) than the J.I. Case 930 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 930.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 930”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/800 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 930”AheadThe J.I. Case 930 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 930”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Bührer 6105 (A)”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 930”AheadThe Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 930 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1975–19781962–1969Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 930 has 51% more hydraulic flow (19.7 L/min / 5.2 gpm) than the Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) has 88% more forward gears (7 gears) than the J.I. Case 930 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 930 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 930 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Bührer Komfort 6105 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources