BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 or John Deere 510?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed. On features, the John Deere 510 is ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.
- The John Deere 510 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 72% (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | BM-55 | 510 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 28.7 kW (38.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 28.8 kW (38.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the BM-55 and the 510. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the BM-55 and the 510. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 15.6 L/min (4.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | AheadThe BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 has 72% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the John Deere 510 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 510. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,241 kg (7,145 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 2,074 kg (4,572 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 is 56% heavier (1,167 kg / 2,573 lb) than the John Deere 510 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 3,320 kg (7,319 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the BM-55. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | AheadThe John Deere 510 has 100% more forward gears (5 gears) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the BM-55 and the 510. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | AheadThe BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the John Deere 510 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | AheadThe John Deere 510 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | liveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the BM-55. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 510” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1953–1959 | 1964–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 510 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 has 72% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the John Deere 510 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 is 56% heavier (1,167 kg / 2,573 lb) than the John Deere 510 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 510 has 100% more forward gears (5 gears) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the John Deere 510 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 510 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 510 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources