BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster or Massey Ferguson MF 135 (Massey Ferguson)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the BM-400 Buster has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster and Massey Ferguson MF 135 (Massey Ferguson), with the call on each
QuestionBM-400 BusterMF 135Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?31.3 kW (42.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the BM-400 Buster has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the BM-400 Buster and the MF 135.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the BM-400 Buster and the MF 135.
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.9 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”18.4 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”AheadThe BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster has 52% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,050 kg (2,315 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 24% more lift (250 kg / 551 lb) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,905 kg (4,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”1,705 kg (3,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster is 12% heavier (200 kg / 441 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the BM-400 Buster and the MF 135.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the BM-400 Buster and the MF 135.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the BM-400 Buster.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 400 Buster”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1964–19691964–1978EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster has 52% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 24% more lift (250 kg / 551 lb) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster is 12% heavier (200 kg / 441 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-400 Buster (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the BM-400 Buster has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources