BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-4 or Fahr D 270 B?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Fahr D 270 B is ahead on top speed.

  • The Fahr D 270 B suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-4 and Fahr D 270 B, with the call on each
QuestionBM-4D 270 BCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?22.1 kW (30 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 4”22.5 kW (30.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the BM-4 and the D 270 B.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the BM-4 and the D 270 B.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the BM-4 and the D 270 B.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the BM-4.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 4”1,880 kg (4,145 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-4 is 25% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Fahr D 270 B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the BM-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?4Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 4”5 to 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the BM-4 and the D 270 B.
Which is faster on the road?15 km/h (9.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 4”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”AheadThe Fahr D 270 B has 33% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-4 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?610 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 4”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the BM-4.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the BM-4.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 4”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1939–19441953–1964Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 270 B is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-4 is 25% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Fahr D 270 B (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fahr D 270 B has 33% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-4 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fahr D 270 B is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources