BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-20 or VALMET 361 D?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the BM-20 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VALMET 361 D suits road haulage better on this data: 50% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-20 and VALMET 361 D, with the call on each
QuestionBM-20361 DCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.2 kW (40.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 20”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the BM-20 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the BM-20 and the 361 D.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the BM-20 and the 361 D.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the BM-20.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,350 kg (2,976 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the BM-20.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 20”1,770 kg (3,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-20 is 50% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the VALMET 361 D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the BM-20 and the 361 D.
Which has the wider choice of gears?5Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 20”6Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the BM-20 and the 361 D.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 20”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”AheadThe VALMET 361 D has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-20 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?545 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 20”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the BM-20.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the BM-20 and the 361 D.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 20”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 361 D”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1945–19501960–1965Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 361 D is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-20 is 50% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the VALMET 361 D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 361 D has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-20 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 361 D is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the BM-20 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources