BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer or MAN 2R3?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the MAN 2R3: three-point lift. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The MAN 2R3 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The MAN 2R3 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 54% (700 kg / 1,543 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer and MAN 2R3, with the call on each
Question350 Boxer2R3Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”33.1 kW (44 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 350 Boxer and the 2R3.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 350 Boxer and the 2R3.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.3 L/min (10.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2R3.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”AheadThe MAN 2R3 has 54% more lift (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,865 kg (6,316 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer is 22% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the MAN 2R3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 350 Boxer and the 2R3.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”8Traktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 350 Boxer.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”19.1 km/h (11.9 mph) to 27.0 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”AheadThe MAN 2R3 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 350 Boxer and the 2R3.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 350 Boxer”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “MAN 2R3”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1959–19671961–1962EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The MAN 2R3 has 54% more lift (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer is 22% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the MAN 2R3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The MAN 2R3 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL 350 Boxer does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources