ALLIS-CHALMERS WD-45 or Porsche-Diesel L 308?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the WD-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the L 308 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for ALLIS-CHALMERS WD-45 and Porsche-Diesel L 308, with the call on each
QuestionWD-45L 308Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?27.9 kW (37.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WD 45”28 kW (38 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the WD-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the L 308 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the WD-45 and the L 308.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the WD-45 and the L 308.
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the WD-45 and the L 308.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,630 kg (3,594 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WD 45”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,794 kg (3,955 lb) to 1,944 kg (4,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WD 45”1,660 kg (3,660 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the WD-45.
Which has the wider choice of gears?4Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WD 45”5Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the WD-45 and the L 308.
Which is faster on the road?19.3 km/h (12.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WD 45”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?548 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WD 45”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the WD-45.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the WD-45 and the L 308.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WD 45”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Porsche-Diesel Super L308”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1953–19571958–1960Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Porsche-Diesel L 308 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Porsche-Diesel L 308 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the WD-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the L 308 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources