ALLIS-CHALMERS Modell-WF vs Hermann Lanz L 25 a
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (39%). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
9 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Modell-WF | L 25 a | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 24 hp | 24.4 hp | — |
| Engine declared | ALLIS-CHALMERS W-110 | Deutz GF2M 115 or wahlweise | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.30 L | 3.98 L | +21% L 25 a |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 9.9 mph · 16 km/h | 12.1 mph · 19.4 km/h | +21% L 25 a |
| Clutch declared | Foot-operated spring-loaded dry Rockford single-plate clutch | single-plate dry clutch from Fichtel & Sachs | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 535 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,490 lb · 1,583 kg | 4,850 lb · 2,200 kg | +39% L 25 a |
| Wheelbase declared | 70.0 in · 1,778 mm | 80.7 in · 2,050 mm | +15% L 25 a |
| Length declared | 122.0 in · 3,099 mm | 112.6 in · 2,860 mm | +8% Modell-WF |
| Width declared | 57.5 in · 1,461 mm | 59.1 in · 1,500 mm | — |
| Height declared | 54.5 in · 1,384 mm | 64.6 in · 1,640 mm | +18% L 25 a |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 11.8 in · 300 mm | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 59.9 qt · 56.7 L | — | — |
ALLIS-CHALMERS Modell-WF sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WF”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers WC”
Hermann Lanz L 25 a sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “HELA L 25 a Holzgas”