ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 or Renault 86?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the FD-5 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 86 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 80% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 and Renault 86, with the call on each
QuestionFD-586Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 5”36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the FD-5 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the FD-5 and the 86.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the FD-5 and the 86.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—23.7 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the FD-5.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,000 kg (2,205 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 5”1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”AheadThe Renault 86 has 80% more lift (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,455 kg (5,412 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 5”1,975 kg (4,354 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 is 24% heavier (480 kg / 1,058 lb) than the Renault 86 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the FD-5 and the 86.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 5”8Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the FD-5 and the 86.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 5”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 5”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 86 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the FD-5.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 5”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 86 R7281”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1963–19651967–1973EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 86 has 80% more lift (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 is 24% heavier (480 kg / 1,058 lb) than the Renault 86 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-5 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 86 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the FD-5 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 86 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources