ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 or ZETOR 35 Super?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the FD-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 35 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The ZETOR 35 Super suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 70% (630 kg / 1,389 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The ZETOR 35 Super suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 and ZETOR 35 Super, with the call on each
QuestionFD-435 SuperCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the FD-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 35 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the FD-4 and the 35 Super.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the FD-4 and the 35 Super.
Which pumps more oil for implements?12.5 L/min (3.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the FD-4.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?900 kg (1,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”1,530 kg (3,373 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”AheadThe ZETOR 35 Super has 70% more lift (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,840 kg (4,057 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 35 Super is 55% heavier (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the FD-4 and the 35 Super.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”5 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the FD-4 and the 35 Super.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”AheadThe ZETOR 35 Super has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 35 Super does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the FD-4 and the 35 Super.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 35 Super”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1962–19651955–1960Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 35 Super has 70% more lift (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 35 Super is 55% heavier (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 35 Super has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 35 Super does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the FD-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 35 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources