ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 or Massey Ferguson MF 135 (Massey Ferguson)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the FD-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 44% (400 kg / 882 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 suits road haulage better on this data: 75% (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 and Massey Ferguson MF 135 (Massey Ferguson), with the call on each
QuestionFD-4MF 135Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the FD-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the FD-4 and the MF 135.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the FD-4 and the MF 135.
Which pumps more oil for implements?18.4 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the FD-4.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?900 kg (1,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 44% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,840 kg (4,057 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”1,705 kg (3,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the FD-4 and the MF 135.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the FD-4 and the MF 135.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 75% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 135 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the FD-4.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers FD 4”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 135”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1962–19651964–1978EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 44% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 135 has 75% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS FD-4 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 135 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the FD-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources