ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 or Fahr D 270 B?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 is ahead on forward gears and top speed.

  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 and Fahr D 270 B, with the call on each
QuestionED-40D 270 BCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?22.4 kW (30.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”22.5 kW (30.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the ED-40 and the D 270 B.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the ED-40 and the D 270 B.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.7 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 270 B.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?980 kg (2,161 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the ED-40: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”); the D 270 B: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,685 kg (3,715 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”1,880 kg (4,145 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 270 B is 12% heavier (195 kg / 430 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the ED-40.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”5 to 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the Fahr D 270 B (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the ED-40 and the D 270 B.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fahr D 270 B (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the ED-40.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1960–19681953–1964Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fahr D 270 B is 12% heavier (195 kg / 430 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the Fahr D 270 B (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fahr D 270 B (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS ED-40 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the ED-40: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers ED 40”); the D 270 B: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources