ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 or SAME Laser 130 DT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The SAME Laser 130 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 98% (2,678 kg / 5,904 lb) more three-point lift.
- The SAME Laser 130 DT suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The SAME Laser 130 DT suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 210 | Laser 130 DT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 91.9 kW (123.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | 91.9 kW (123.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 210 and the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 210 and the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | AheadThe SAME Laser 130 DT has 98% more lift (2,678 kg / 5,904 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,636 kg (12,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | 5,170 kg (11,398 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 210 and the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | AheadThe SAME Laser 130 DT has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 210. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | AheadThe SAME Laser 130 DT has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | AheadThe SAME Laser 130 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 210 and the Laser 130 DT. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 210” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Laser 130” | AheadThe SAME Laser 130 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1970–1972 | 1983–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Laser 130 DT is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SAME Laser 130 DT has 98% more lift (2,678 kg / 5,904 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Laser 130 DT has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Laser 130 DT has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Laser 130 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The SAME Laser 130 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the ALLIS-CHALMERS 210 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The SAME Laser 130 DT is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Laser 130 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources