ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 or SOMECA 800 (TD)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 800 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (7.9 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 and SOMECA 800 (TD), with the call on each
Question190800 (TD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 800 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 190 and the 800 (TD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 190 and the 800 (TD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?45.4 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”37.5 L/min (9.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 has 21% more hydraulic flow (7.9 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the SOMECA 800 (TD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,086 kg (4,599 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”2,456 kg (5,415 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 190: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”); the 800 (TD): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,477 kg (7,665 lb) to 3,558 kg (7,844 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 is 16% heavier (477 kg / 1,052 lb) than the SOMECA 800 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 190 and the 800 (TD).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”12Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”AheadThe SOMECA 800 (TD) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 190 and the 800 (TD).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 800 (TD) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 190.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”AheadThe SOMECA 800 (TD) is available with four-wheel drive; the ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1964–19731968–1971EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 has 21% more hydraulic flow (7.9 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the SOMECA 800 (TD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 is 16% heavier (477 kg / 1,052 lb) than the SOMECA 800 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The SOMECA 800 (TD) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA 800 (TD) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The SOMECA 800 (TD) is available with four-wheel drive; the ALLIS-CHALMERS 190 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 800 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 190: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 190”); the 800 (TD): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 800”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources