AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) or VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Volvo 805 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 81% (1,860 kg / 4,101 lb) more three-point lift.
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Rodeo 95 (DT) | Volvo 805 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Volvo 805 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the Volvo 805. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the Volvo 805. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Volvo 805. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,290 kg (5,049 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | AheadThe VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 has 81% more lift (1,860 kg / 4,101 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,370 kg (7,430 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 3,540 kg (7,804 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the Volvo 805. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the Volvo 805. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | AheadThe VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | AheadThe AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1980 | 1983–1986 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 has 81% more lift (1,860 kg / 4,101 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Volvo 805 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources