AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) or SAME Explorer 90 II (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Explorer 90 II (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) and SAME Explorer 90 II (DT), with the call on each
QuestionRodeo 90 (DT)Explorer 90 II (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Explorer 90 II (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the Explorer 90 II (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the Explorer 90 II (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”35.8 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”AheadThe SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) has 19% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,290 kg (5,049 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Explorer 90 II (DT).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,250 kg (7,165 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”3,110 kg (6,856 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the Explorer 90 II (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”15 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the Explorer 90 II (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”AheadThe SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer II 90”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19801989–1998Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) has 19% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Explorer 90 II (DT) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Explorer 90 II (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources