AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 1085?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1085 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 1085, with the call on each
QuestionRodeo 90 (DT)MF 1085Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1085 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the MF 1085.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the MF 1085.
Which pumps more oil for implements?30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”AheadThe AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) has 13% more hydraulic flow (3.5 L/min / 0.9 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 1085 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,290 kg (5,049 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 1085 has 22% more lift (510 kg / 1,124 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,250 kg (7,165 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”3,851 kg (8,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 1085 is 18% heavier (601 kg / 1,325 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the MF 1085.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085”AheadThe AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 1085 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19801973–1978EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) has 13% more hydraulic flow (3.5 L/min / 0.9 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson 1085 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 1085 has 22% more lift (510 kg / 1,124 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 1085 is 18% heavier (601 kg / 1,325 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson 1085 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1085 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources