AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) or International Harvester 886?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 886 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester 886 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 40% (910 kg / 2,006 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The International Harvester 886 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) and International Harvester 886, with the call on each
QuestionRodeo 90 (DT)886Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 886 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the 886.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the 886.
Which pumps more oil for implements?30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 886.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,290 kg (5,049 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”AheadThe International Harvester 886 has 40% more lift (910 kg / 2,006 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,250 kg (7,165 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”5,325 kg (11,740 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 886 is 64% heavier (2,075 kg / 4,575 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the 886.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Rodeo 90 (DT) and the 886.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”AheadThe International Harvester 886 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 886.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 886”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19801976–1981EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 886 has 40% more lift (910 kg / 2,006 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 886 is 64% heavier (2,075 kg / 4,575 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 886 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 90 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 886 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources