AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo or Renault Ceres 95 X (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the A-90 DL-Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ceres 95 X (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Ceres 95 X (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 53% (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo and Renault Ceres 95 X (A), with the call on each
QuestionA-90 DL-TurboCeres 95 X (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?62.5 kW (83.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-90 DL-Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ceres 95 X (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the A-90 DL-Turbo and the Ceres 95 X (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the A-90 DL-Turbo and the Ceres 95 X (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.5 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”52.9 L/min (14.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”AheadThe Renault Ceres 95 X (A) has 53% more hydraulic flow (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”4,570 kg (10,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the A-90 DL-Turbo: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”); the Ceres 95 X (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,130 kg (6,900 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”3,455 kg (7,617 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ceres 95 X (A) is 10% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,735 kg (12,644 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the A-90 DL-Turbo.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”18 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the A-90 DL-Turbo and the Ceres 95 X (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”AheadThe Renault Ceres 95 X (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Ceres 95 X (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19951994–1998EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Ceres 95 X (A) has 53% more hydraulic flow (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ceres 95 X (A) is 10% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ceres 95 X (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL A-90 DL-Turbo does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-90 DL-Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ceres 95 X (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the A-90 DL-Turbo: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-90 DL”); the Ceres 95 X (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 95X”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources