AGRIFULL A-65 DL or Renault 70-34 PX?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 70-34 PX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | A-65 DL | 70-34 PX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the 70-34 PX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the 70-34 PX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 32.1 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | AheadThe Renault 70-34 PX has 21% more hydraulic flow (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the AGRIFULL A-65 DL (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the A-65 DL. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,950 kg (6,504 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 3,230 kg (7,121 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the A-65 DL. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the A-65 DL and the 70-34 PX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | AheadThe Renault 70-34 PX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL A-65 DL does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-34 PE/PA/PS/PX R3132” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1995 | 1989–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 70-34 PX has 21% more hydraulic flow (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the AGRIFULL A-65 DL (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 70-34 PX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL A-65 DL does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-34 PX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources