AGRIFULL A-65 DL or Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Crono-Target 70 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL A-65 DL and Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionA-65 DLCrono-Target 70 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Crono-Target 70 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the Crono-Target 70 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the Crono-Target 70 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Crono-Target 70 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the A-65 DL.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,950 kg (6,504 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”2,070 kg (4,564 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL A-65 DL is 43% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the Crono-Target 70 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the A-65 DL and the Crono-Target 70 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini CRONO Target 70”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19952005–2009Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGRIFULL A-65 DL is 43% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini Crono-Target 70 (DT) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Crono-Target 70 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources