AGRIFULL A-65 DL or Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 70 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | A-65 DL | XE 70 Tradition | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 70 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the A-65 DL. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,950 kg (6,504 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL A-65 DL is 26% heavier (600 kg / 1,323 lb) than the Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the A-65 DL and the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 20 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the A-65 DL and the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | 540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-65 DL” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1995 | 2005–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGRIFULL A-65 DL is 26% heavier (600 kg / 1,323 lb) than the Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the A-65 DL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 70 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources