AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo or Massey Ferguson MF 1132?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo: hydraulic flow.
- The AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | A-140 DT Turbo | MF 1132 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 94.4 kW (126.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 94 kW (126 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the A-140 DT Turbo and the MF 1132. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the A-140 DT Turbo and the MF 1132. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 50.8 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 45.0 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | AheadThe AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo has 13% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the A-140 DT Turbo: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo”); the MF 1132: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 5,860 kg (12,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo is 16% heavier (940 kg / 2,072 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the A-140 DT Turbo. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on a creeper range: every machine offers one. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1987–1991 | 1977–1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo has 13% more hydraulic flow (5.8 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo is 16% heavier (940 kg / 2,072 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL A-140 DT Turbo is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the A-140 DT Turbo: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull A-140 Turbo”); the MF 1132: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and maximum permissible mass.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources