AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) or Renault 80 S-Vigneron?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-60 F (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 80 S-Vigneron suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (4.8 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 35% (560 kg / 1,235 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-60 F (DT) | 80 S-Vigneron | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-60 F (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT) and the 80 S-Vigneron. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT) and the 80 S-Vigneron. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | AheadThe Renault 80 S-Vigneron has 22% more hydraulic flow (4.8 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,155 kg (4,751 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 1,595 kg (3,516 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) is 35% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Renault 80 S-Vigneron (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT) and the 80 S-Vigneron. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-60 F (DT) and the 80 S-Vigneron. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | AheadThe AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 S-Vigneron does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7385” | AheadThe AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80 S-Vigneron is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1986 | 1976–1984 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 80 S-Vigneron has 22% more hydraulic flow (4.8 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) is 35% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Renault 80 S-Vigneron (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 S-Vigneron does not (as stated by the sources).
- The AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80 S-Vigneron is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-60 F (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 S-Vigneron has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources