AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) or UTB Universal 600?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Universal 600 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) and UTB Universal 600, with the call on each
Question80-56 (DT)Universal 600Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 600”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Universal 600 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT) and the Universal 600.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT) and the Universal 600.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 600”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT) and the Universal 600.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”2,050 kg (4,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 600”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) is 12% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the UTB Universal 600 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT) and the Universal 600.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”12Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 600”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-56 (DT) and the Universal 600.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 600”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 600”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Universal 600.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 600”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1980–19861974–Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) is 12% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the UTB Universal 600 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Universal 600 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources