AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) or Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 71% (15.6 L/min / 4.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) and Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K), with the call on each
Question80-56 (DT)6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT) and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT) and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”37.6 L/min (9.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”AheadThe Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has 71% more hydraulic flow (15.6 L/min / 4.1 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,008 kg (4,427 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT) and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-56 (DT) and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”AheadThe Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”AheadThe Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1980–19861993–2000Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has 71% more hydraulic flow (15.6 L/min / 4.1 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources