AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) or Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-50 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 55% (749 kg / 1,651 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-50 (DT) | 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 5560 L (DT)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-50 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-50 (DT) and the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-50 (DT) and the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,351 kg (2,978 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 5560 L (DT)” | AheadThe Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has 55% more lift (749 kg / 1,651 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,790 kg (3,946 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | 2,120 kg (4,674 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 5560 L (DT)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) is 18% heavier (330 kg / 728 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-50 (DT) and the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 9Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 5560 L (DT)” | AheadThe Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has 33% more forward gears (3 gears) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-50 (DT) and the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 5560 L (DT)” | AheadThe Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini R 5560 L (DT)” | AheadThe Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-50” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini R 5560 L (DT)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1981–1986 | 1988–2000 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has 55% more lift (749 kg / 1,651 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) is 18% heavier (330 kg / 728 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has 33% more forward gears (3 gears) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 80-50 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Landini 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-50 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5860 (DT) TL 38 N/M (TL-38 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources