AGRIFULL 80-105 DT or WHITE 2-105?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-105 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-105 DT | 2-105 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 78.7 kW (105.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 78 kW (105 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-105 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT and the 2-105. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT and the 2-105. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 28.0 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-105. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,940 kg (8,686 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 5,357 kg (11,810 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-105 is 36% heavier (1,417 kg / 3,124 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT and the 2-105. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-105 DT and the 2-105. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | AheadThe AGRIFULL 80-105 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-105 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-105” | AheadThe AGRIFULL 80-105 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-105 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1986 | 1974–1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 80-105 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 2-105 is 36% heavier (1,417 kg / 3,124 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL 80-105 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-105 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The AGRIFULL 80-105 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-105 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The AGRIFULL 80-105 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-105 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources