AGRIFULL 80-105 DT or Landini 11800 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-105 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 11800 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Landini 11800 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 83% (23.2 L/min / 6.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Landini 11800 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-105 DT | 11800 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 78.7 kW (105.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 78.8 kW (105.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-105 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 11800 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT and the 11800 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT and the 11800 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 28.0 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | AheadThe Landini 11800 (DT) has 83% more hydraulic flow (23.2 L/min / 6.1 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 4,497 kg (9,914 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,940 kg (8,686 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 4,390 kg (9,678 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 11800 (DT) is 11% heavier (450 kg / 992 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-105 DT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | AheadThe Landini 11800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-105 DT and the 11800 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | AheadThe Landini 11800 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 11800 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-105” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 11800 DT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1986 | 1987–2000 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 11800 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini 11800 (DT) has 83% more hydraulic flow (23.2 L/min / 6.1 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 11800 (DT) is 11% heavier (450 kg / 992 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 11800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 11800 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-105 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 11800 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-105 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 11800 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources